Viewing entries tagged
CNN business

Chinese brands are coming, for these two reasons | Dominique Turpin | LinkedIn

Chinese brands are coming, for these two reasons | Dominique Turpin | LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20141014071001-3458678-chinese-brands-are-coming-for-these-two-reasons?_mSplash=1

Chinese brands are coming, for these two reasons

About 10 years ago the Chinese government invited me to give a talk in Beijing on global brands. Afterwards a government official came up to me and predicted that by the 2008 Beijing Olympics, there would be at least five Chinese companies in Interbrand’s list of the top 100 global brands.

He was wrong in 2008, and he’s still wrong today. Six years on from the Beijing games, there is only one Chinese brand in the top 100. That’s Huawei, a telecoms equipment maker, which has just become the first Chinese company to enter the top 100 and is at number 94 in Interbrand’s new 2014 list.

Some of the current chatter is not encouraging. Late last month I was at the World Marketing Summit in Tokyo with top marketers from around the globe, and there was very little buzz about Chinese brands.

Why the relative silence? Largely it’s because Chinese products, rightly or wrongly, are still often perceived as being low-quality copycat versions of better products elsewhere. Sportswear company Li-Ning is struggling to develop a global brand because its products are not seen as being innovative or distinctive enough. So it finds itself squeezed between cheap local brands and big global ones such as Nike and Adidas. Likewise, consumer electronics firm Aigo is often regarded as a Samsung imitator rather than an emerging brand with its own distinctive story.

But the entry of Huawei into the top 100 this year is significant. I think the Chinese brand breakthrough is coming. And I think it will come sooner rather than later, for two reasons.

First, China’s economic weight and competitive strength are simply becoming too great for the country not to have global brands.

China will soon overtake the US as the world's largest economy on some measures, and Chinese firms are investing billions to compete overseas with established western brands. The recent $25bn initial public offering (IPO) in New York from Chinese e-commerce group Alibaba was the biggest ever. And, symbolically, Chinese insurance group Anbang is now buying the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Manhattan for almost $2bn.

At some point, all this Chinese economic muscle will translate into the soft power of brands. In fact this is already happening. Some of you reading this might use a Lenovo PC, have a Haier refrigerator at home and drink the occasional Tsingtao beer, for example.

Second, Chinese companies can’t keep relying on low-cost production of standard products for their competitive edge. As manufacturing shifts to lower-cost locations such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, Chinese firms need to add more value and beef up their branding.

As I wrote in a previous post, the next big global brands will come from companies that follow five rules: having a clear product focus; making it different and meaningful; investing in communication; innovating constantly; and staying in touch with customers and staff. Underpinning all this are guts and plenty of emotion, which separate brands from mere products.

Global brand-building is a tough business and takes time. Just ask Japanese and South Korean companies, which took decades establishing themselves on the world stage. Or ask the handful of emerging-market brands that have made it big in the past 10 years or so, such as La Martina, the upscale polo company from Argentina, and my old favorite Havaianas, the Brazilian flip-flop sandal maker.

Now it’s the turn of Chinese brands. Xiaomi Technology, a Chinese mobile phone maker, was only founded in 2010 but has quickly built a strong brand at home. The company co-develops its operating system with its keenest users via online forums, and as a result its new product launches are like rock concerts. Xiaomi is one to watch, for sure, and there will be others too.

Huawei is now in the top 100, and other Chinese brands are knocking at the door. In fact they might go global faster than other emerging-market brands because of China’s economic strength and the urgent need for its companies to shift away from a low-cost focus.

The government official I met 10 years ago probably won’t be wrong for much longer.

What’s your view? Which Chinese companies will be next to enter Interbrand’s top 100 list? Which sectors are most likely to be disrupted by the entry of Chinese brands? What might hold Chinese brands back?

Look At Things (differently)

Look At Things (differently)

Look At Things (differently)

Apple Struggling to Regain Its Ethos

By Max Daves 

After the release of ios7, I spent nearly two hours talking with people from the engineering department at Apple. They asked me a very telling question... Do you think we are trying to hard (since Steve died)? This one statement showed me that the visionary leadership was lacking and had caused some confusion and trepidation in what direction to go. My response was, remember your compant ethos. Think different. Following google is not a innovative market leading think different ethos.  

The releases of products and the ios changes illustrates this. Added features are nice but real earth shaking market leading innovation has not materialized. However, fear of google and it's market share has. 

Recent iOS8 problems are but another symptom of a deeper problem at Apple.... Attention to detail. The devil is in the details just as the proof is in the pudding. There are cracks in the innovation, refinement development and release cycles.  

The innovation cycle at Apple has always leaned towards being longer than competitors. This allowed them to leap frog competitive innovations in other ecosystems. This process has served Apple well for years and allowed them to lead market innovation by not being led into the trap of the typical product release cycle of their competitors. Sadly this has slipped some under Tim Cooks watch. Patience is a virtue that harmoniously dwells with creative innovation in product development and refinement. 

I agree with the article link below at end of this post. It mirrors many conversations I have had with others in the recent months about a lack of focused vision, focused leadership and dedication to innovation driven refinement of various aspects of Apple's OSX, iOS applications and hardware. 

Harmonious integration of iCloud in both the mobile iOS and OSX seems incomplete and lacking creative vision in regards with applications. 

Many features like predictive type, Siri and maps seem more like unrefined betas. 

The lack of attention to detail emerges in the failure to stick with a focused refinement strategy. 

The full realization of what appleTV can be has become nearly an afterthought. This approach has carried on to software as well. 

The pieces are all there for a giant leap forward in functionality, seemless integration and high design for a truly unpresidented user experience that is so close that it feels like being teased with the potential even as it falls short. 

While it is true that Apple is still the leader, it has been losing ground to competitors simply for the reason it seems unfocused and disconnected from both its enthusiasts and its own corporate ethos. After speaking with many users of both the consumer and power user variety, I find that they both generally have one thing in common. They both are not only disappointed with the prior bugginess of iOS7 and the failed release of iOS8 but find it damn right frustrating and unintuitive as the previous iOS's had been. They also feel slighted by Apple in terms of the new versions of iWork and iLife applications being stripped of very popular functionality and familiar operations. This shows once more a disconnect by Apple HQ and leadership with their customers. Over simplification is not always intuitive and clean minimalist design. It's lack of attention to detail. 

Know thy self and know thy customer. Apple seems to be experiencing a company existential crisis. They seem to have forgotten their own ethos while at the same time have continued a troubling disjointedness in understanding their customers. 

It is time for Apple to look at things differently. Steve Jobs is gone but their are many capable visionary people out there who understand and follow the ethos that made Apple. Maybe it's time to find them and let them move Apple forward. 

 

 

Max Daves

CEO (idea)ology Group

Co-founder Safe Haven Strategic

www.idea-ology.com

(futurist | serial innovator | global strategist | visionary | socially conscious entrepreneur | radical solutionist | status quo disruptor | chief idea-ologist)

"Break the rules they taught you in business school. If it really worked they wouldn't have been teaching them to you... They would have been proving it works by doing it. Now let's go think up something new and make it happen."

The following article is old in terms if social media new cycles but it is timely in terms of the recent struggles in product releases. 

http://www.infoworld.com/d/consumerization-of-it/apps-are-apples-achilles-heel-232437?source=IFWNLE_nlt_apps_2013-12-12

Maverick or Maintainer?

Maverick or Maintainer?

 

Maverick Or Maintainer? 

Some of Americas brightest minds... Most brilliant inventors and foremost creative people are lost to public and private sector organizations because of institutional arrogance, prideful leadership and bureaucratic red tape which creates a culture of mediocrity. That manner of organizational mindset always leads itself blindly towards a special kind of peril... One in which it's varicose structures are found wholly incapable of the creative maverick like thinking which is necessary to navigate the stormy waters of history. It has been said that you can always count on America to do the right thing after they have exhausted everything else first. I would say that the complacency (maintenance thinking) that allows status quo managers rather than visionary leaders into positions of power and influence, actually create the opportunities for the great ones to rise up when the ineptitude of those preceding them have been rattled loose from their controlling mediocrity. This does not come without travail. For mediocrity does not breed inspiration but inspiring people breed inspiration and those people are anything but mediocre. They are the mavericks. No one has made a lasting positive impact upon human society by following the crowd and playing it safe. 

When a public or private sector organization devolves into the dialectic of "maintenance thinking" it becomes rigid, hyper predictable and brittle. This alone creates the conditions for competitors to exploit its unseen weaknesses. Instead of taking risk and breaking the cycle of dysfunction to course correct, far too often these organizations fall into the organizational OCD death spiral constructing more bureaucracy. This of course only causes more problems feeding the exponential quotient. When they should be taking more innovative risk they actually do the opposite which locks out the very mavericks they need to right the ship. 

When a nation, an organization or a people don't take risk, they by default cede their opportunities to those who will rise up and take the necessary risk in the time of disruption when fear grips and tears at those who merely tried to maintain their positioning. Innovation and creative solutions are fearful things to those who have become slaves to their maintenance of present position. Such static thinking creates its destruction by denial mechanisms meant to "maintain" over "move forward." Nothing in this world is truly static. Everything is dynamic and ever changing. When business or government or individuals settle for "maintain" they are actually choosing  the dynamic of loss instead of gain. As the organization is disrupted it either adapts to changing conditions or it perishes. 

But alas this is when those visionaries... Those mavericks rise to the occasion and seize the day. Every great victory is preceded by years of agonizing failures and setbacks. But are they really failures and setbacks? No they are part of the crucible which makes the maverick into who they really are. So too this can be with organizations. 

Are you a maverick or a maintainer? Does you organization and it's leadership exhibit maverick or maintainer tendencies? 

Does your professional DNA admire or loath mavericks? Your survival in the new economy may depend on how you and your organization answer that question. Are you willing to accept the mavericks? Because they won't stop being mavericks even if you don't trying stop being in their way. They will succeed. They will rise and one day you will need those unknown mavericks to step up whether you like it or not. They are here and they are coming in greater numbers. You can bet they will bring real change to you and your organizations. Or they will replace them. Better a friend than a foe. 

A few thoughts to ponder from an American Maverick. Think it forward now. 

 

-Max Daves

CEO (idea)ology Group

Co-founder Safe Haven Strategic

(futurist | serial innovator | global strategist | visionary | socially conscious entrepreneur | radical solutionist | status quo disruptor | chief idea-ologist)

"Break the rules they taught you in business school. If it really worked they wouldn't have been teaching them to you... They would have been proving it works by doing it. Now let's go think up something new and make it happen." 

If you are interested in learning how to take yourself, your ideas or your organization "maverick" email max@idea-ology.com or visit www.idea-ology.com