Why You Should Stop Being a Boss and Be a Leader

Why You Should Stop Being a Boss and Be a Leader http://www.inc.com/lolly-daskal/the-choice-is-yours-boss-or-leader-pick-one.html

The way you approach being in charge—whether you’re running a corporation, a civic organization, or a neighborhood bake sale—is a huge factor in the group’s achievement. Think about the differences before you step up. Advertisement Every business and work group has a boss, but only some have a leader at the helm.

The differences are clear—and which one your organization has will determine, in large part, what you can achieve and how you will achieve it.

So if you’re in charge, or if you aspire to be, you have a decision to make: Are you going to be the boss or are you going to be the leader?

The choice is entirely up to you, of course—but here are some points to consider as you make up your mind:

A boss drives others; a leader coaches them toward their best performance. A boss instills fear; a leader inspires enthusiasm. A boss blames others; a leader works to help repair the damage and understand what happened so it won’t occur again. A boss thinks in terms of him or herself; a leader thinks in terms of we. A boss knows how it’s done; a leader shows how it’s done. A boss depends on his or her own authority; a leader depends, along with the entire team, on mutual accountability and trust. A boss uses people; a leader is interested in helping them grow and develop. A boss takes the credit; a leader gives credit to others. A boss you is a commander; a leader is more concerned with asking and listening. The boss says Go!; the leader says Let’s go! When you make the choice to be a leader, there are some things you have to give up: Ego, for one. Doing it your way. Always knowing you’re right. Never having your world view challenged.

In exchange, though, you’ll gain a few things: An atmosphere of collegiality and collaboration.

A workplace that people will line up to work at. An authentic authority that comes from who you are, not what you say or do. The chance to change lives—including your own.

You don’t have to look very hard to see that we already have plenty of bosses in the world.

What we’re lacking is great leaders.

Are you ready to choose?

IMAGE: Shutterstock Last updated: Sep 29, 2014

@LollyDaskal

LOLLY DASKAL

Lolly Daskal is the president and CEO of Lead From Within, a global consultancy that specializes in leadership and entrepreneurial development. Daskal’s programs galvanize clients into achieving their best, helping them accelerate and deliver on their professional goals and business objectives. Trust Across America has identified Daskal as a Top 100 Thought Leader in Trustworthy Business Behavior. Lead From Within is a consultancy with global scope, and Daskal’s clients value her exceptional commitment to excellence, integrity, and results.

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPhone

3 Reasons Why You Are Failing at Problem Solving

3 Reasons Why You Are Failing at Problem Solving http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/228096

The line between success and failure is often thin. An important thing you can do to put yourself on the right side of that line is to maximize the quality of your knowledge, and use strong methods to solve problems.

Early Artificial Intelligence (AI) researchers realized that the difficulty with their computer programs was that they had no real expertise in the areas in which they were solving problems, and so they had to rely on very general strategies, or weak methods of problem solving.

In contrast, strong methods for problem solving require specific knowledge about a subject. Essentially, the more you know, the better you are at solving problems.

The most important kind of knowledge that you can use to solve problems is what psychologists call causal knowledge. Causal knowledge is what you need to answer the question "why?" It is the basis of people's expertise. For example, you pay a mechanic to fix your car, because mechanics understand how cars work.

Unfortunately, even though causal knowledge is crucial for solving new problems, the quality of your knowledge may not be as good as you think it is. People suffer from a persistent illusion of explanatory depth. That is, we believe that we understand the way the world works far better than we actually do.

Related: How to Improve Your Critical Thinking Skills and Make Better Business Decisions

There are several reasons why our causal knowledge is poor.

  1. Opting for the "high-level view." We often try to get the "high-level view" of how things work rather than really trying to understand the details. Unfortunately, these details often turn out to be important. Just ask the people who signed off on (and purchased) complex mortgage-backed financial instruments without understanding how they worked.

  2. Using meaningless jargon. We often have words whose meanings we don't understand that paper over gaps in our knowledge. I once attended a corporate meeting as a consultant at which an executive encouraged his team to streamline their business practices. Everyone nodded in agreement, but later that day it became clear that nobody was sure what it meant to streamline the business. The word created an illusion of comprehension in the group.

  3. Only thinking of the first-level explanation. Our explanations are nested like Russian dolls. If you have ever spent time with a five-year-old, you have experienced this nesting. The child asks you why something works. You answer, and they ask why again…and again…We believe our causal knowledge is better than it is, because we only think about that first-level explanation, and fail to keep asking ourselves why when checking to see if we understand something. A lot of people in the financial industry could give the basic description of the way the structured financial instruments worked, but they could not explain their details.

Ultimately, if you want to cure this illusion of explanatory depth, you need to take a lesson from education. Any teacher knows that the surest way to guarantee that you understand something is to teach it to someone else. The process of trying to teach something reveals all of the gaps and limitations in your knowledge.

Rather than waiting for the opportunity to teach it to someone else, though, you have to learn to teach it to yourself. That means that whenever you encounter new information, it is not enough to get the executive summary. You need to make yourself responsible for the details, because those details will become important later when you need to use that knowledge to do something.

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPhone

Defining Problems: The Most Important Business Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

Defining Problems: The Most Important Business Skill You’ve Never Been Taught http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/237668

Problem Solving 4 min read

Michael Cooper Contributor Founder of Innovators + Influencers September 26, 2014 Albert Einstein once said, “If I were given one hour to save the planet, I would spend 59 minutes defining the problem and one minute resolving it.” While that may sound extreme, it does highlight the importance of defining problems. It also hints at some interesting facts: A well-defined problem often contains its own solution within it, and that solution is usually quite obvious and straightforward. By defining problems properly, you make them easier to solve, which means saving time, money and resources.

Related: 3 Reasons Why You Are Failing at Problem Solving

Every businessperson needs to master the ability to define problems, or challenges, but very few MBA programs, leadership development programs or management training programs teach this indispensable skill. I spoke to a group of 80 HR managers recently and asked if any of them had been taught how to define problems. Only one person raised a hand. That’s common to most business groups I speak with on a weekly basis. Less than 1 percent of the workforce has been taught how to define problems.

During my first five years as a coach, I didn’t know how to define problems properly, but in the ten years since, I’ve learned this critical technique. I use it every single day, with every single client. It has transformed how I work with people and has made the work much more impactful. These days, clients will hire me solely based on the fact that I have the ability to define their problems during our very first conversation together. When I hear them begin to differentiate between issues, asking, “Which problem are we solving?” I know that I’ve made a major impact on their business.

Related: Problem Solved

Defining problems is simple and any difficulty that arises is because it requires patience, repetition and thorough examination. It is the most important element of critical thinking.

You can define problems correctly in just three steps I call the Problem Definition Filter:

  1. Explore the current situation. Paint a picture in words by including the “presenting problem,” the impact it is having, the consequences of not solving the problem, and the emotions the problem is creating for those involved.

  2. Explain. Once you have examined and clearly explained the situation, draft a simple problem statement by filling in the blank: The problem that we are trying to solve is: ___. Distill the problem to its simplest form possible.

  3. Ask yourself. “Why is that a problem?” If the answer is another problem, then congratulate yourself for moving from the “presenting problem” to a deeper problem. Then ask yourself again, “Why is that a problem?” Do that repeatedly until you either land on what is obviously the source of all of the problems you’ve identified or you identify unexpected consequences of not solving the problem. If you land on unexpected consequences, the problem you identified right before that is likely your “source problem.”

Toyota famously created the “five why’s” technique for their Six Sigma process improvement program. While that number was limited to five why’s, the truth is sometimes it takes only one why. Other times, it may take 17. Ask as many times as needed until you get to the source problem.

This high-level overview of the Problem Definition Filter can help you learn how to define the problems in your department or business and determine if you’re wasting time and resources on poorly defined problems. When it comes to determining whether you have defined a problem well, ask yourself or your collaborators if the solution to the problem is obvious or straightforward. Also, ask if it is a problem worth solving — many problems aren’t.

Related: Creative Problem-Solving Strategies to Test Your Business Idea

3 Hard Choices That Can Boost Your Odds of Startup Success When juggling all the risks, some entrepreneurs manage to come up winners. But it’s not an easy game.

To Solve Big Problems, Assume Everything Is Wrong and Ask Dumb Questions Rather than play the game you’re expected to play, play a new one.

4 Tests to Tell If You’re Ready to Be an Entrepreneur Have you met these conditions and do you exhibit the drive to start a venture of your own?

Work Experience, Be Damned: Here’s How to Hire the Best Problem Solvers (Infographic) Throwing curveballs during job interviews can help weed out candidates who possess valuable critical thinking skills.

3 Ways to Stay Motivated When things get tough, look to these three tips.

How to Solve Big Problems: Start Small Lessons learned from cancer scientists about how to solve large, complex issues.

Don’t Fire These 3 Rotten Customers, Profit From Them Deciding not to deal with certain people is like leaving money on the table. How’s how to deal with these clients sure to give you a headache.

Spanx Aims to Get More Closet Real Estate with New Denim Line The beloved shapewear company expands with a collection of skinny jeans.

How Would You Handle These 7 Situations? Would You Pass the ‘Diaper Test’? There are many moral and ethical questions business owners face on a regular basis. Is there a right way to do things?

The 5 Questions That Will Close the Deal How asking ‘why’ can help you lock up the sale.

If You Want a Better Outcome, Take Better Actions There’s only so much you can control, but it’s how you act that usually determines your circumstances.

There Is No Magic Formula for Small-Business Success — Only This It takes hard work to get the best team players engaged in the right tasks and to resolve the inevitable conflicts.

Facing Startup Uncertainty? Try 2 Different Ways to Plan for the Future. New business owners often rely on prediction or creation logic — and sometimes use both.

Want to Solve Problems More Efficiently? Do This. Learning how to program gives your brain more tools and can change the way you think.

Richard Branson Announces Unlimited Vacation Policy for Virgin Staffers The billionaire will allow employees to take time off whenever they want and without prior approval — provided they still get their work done.

(via Instapaper)

Sent from my iPhone

Look At Things (differently)

Look At Things (differently)

Look At Things (differently)

Apple Struggling to Regain Its Ethos

By Max Daves 

After the release of ios7, I spent nearly two hours talking with people from the engineering department at Apple. They asked me a very telling question... Do you think we are trying to hard (since Steve died)? This one statement showed me that the visionary leadership was lacking and had caused some confusion and trepidation in what direction to go. My response was, remember your compant ethos. Think different. Following google is not a innovative market leading think different ethos.  

The releases of products and the ios changes illustrates this. Added features are nice but real earth shaking market leading innovation has not materialized. However, fear of google and it's market share has. 

Recent iOS8 problems are but another symptom of a deeper problem at Apple.... Attention to detail. The devil is in the details just as the proof is in the pudding. There are cracks in the innovation, refinement development and release cycles.  

The innovation cycle at Apple has always leaned towards being longer than competitors. This allowed them to leap frog competitive innovations in other ecosystems. This process has served Apple well for years and allowed them to lead market innovation by not being led into the trap of the typical product release cycle of their competitors. Sadly this has slipped some under Tim Cooks watch. Patience is a virtue that harmoniously dwells with creative innovation in product development and refinement. 

I agree with the article link below at end of this post. It mirrors many conversations I have had with others in the recent months about a lack of focused vision, focused leadership and dedication to innovation driven refinement of various aspects of Apple's OSX, iOS applications and hardware. 

Harmonious integration of iCloud in both the mobile iOS and OSX seems incomplete and lacking creative vision in regards with applications. 

Many features like predictive type, Siri and maps seem more like unrefined betas. 

The lack of attention to detail emerges in the failure to stick with a focused refinement strategy. 

The full realization of what appleTV can be has become nearly an afterthought. This approach has carried on to software as well. 

The pieces are all there for a giant leap forward in functionality, seemless integration and high design for a truly unpresidented user experience that is so close that it feels like being teased with the potential even as it falls short. 

While it is true that Apple is still the leader, it has been losing ground to competitors simply for the reason it seems unfocused and disconnected from both its enthusiasts and its own corporate ethos. After speaking with many users of both the consumer and power user variety, I find that they both generally have one thing in common. They both are not only disappointed with the prior bugginess of iOS7 and the failed release of iOS8 but find it damn right frustrating and unintuitive as the previous iOS's had been. They also feel slighted by Apple in terms of the new versions of iWork and iLife applications being stripped of very popular functionality and familiar operations. This shows once more a disconnect by Apple HQ and leadership with their customers. Over simplification is not always intuitive and clean minimalist design. It's lack of attention to detail. 

Know thy self and know thy customer. Apple seems to be experiencing a company existential crisis. They seem to have forgotten their own ethos while at the same time have continued a troubling disjointedness in understanding their customers. 

It is time for Apple to look at things differently. Steve Jobs is gone but their are many capable visionary people out there who understand and follow the ethos that made Apple. Maybe it's time to find them and let them move Apple forward. 

 

 

Max Daves

CEO (idea)ology Group

Co-founder Safe Haven Strategic

www.idea-ology.com

(futurist | serial innovator | global strategist | visionary | socially conscious entrepreneur | radical solutionist | status quo disruptor | chief idea-ologist)

"Break the rules they taught you in business school. If it really worked they wouldn't have been teaching them to you... They would have been proving it works by doing it. Now let's go think up something new and make it happen."

The following article is old in terms if social media new cycles but it is timely in terms of the recent struggles in product releases. 

http://www.infoworld.com/d/consumerization-of-it/apps-are-apples-achilles-heel-232437?source=IFWNLE_nlt_apps_2013-12-12

Maverick or Maintainer?

Maverick or Maintainer?

 

Maverick Or Maintainer? 

Some of Americas brightest minds... Most brilliant inventors and foremost creative people are lost to public and private sector organizations because of institutional arrogance, prideful leadership and bureaucratic red tape which creates a culture of mediocrity. That manner of organizational mindset always leads itself blindly towards a special kind of peril... One in which it's varicose structures are found wholly incapable of the creative maverick like thinking which is necessary to navigate the stormy waters of history. It has been said that you can always count on America to do the right thing after they have exhausted everything else first. I would say that the complacency (maintenance thinking) that allows status quo managers rather than visionary leaders into positions of power and influence, actually create the opportunities for the great ones to rise up when the ineptitude of those preceding them have been rattled loose from their controlling mediocrity. This does not come without travail. For mediocrity does not breed inspiration but inspiring people breed inspiration and those people are anything but mediocre. They are the mavericks. No one has made a lasting positive impact upon human society by following the crowd and playing it safe. 

When a public or private sector organization devolves into the dialectic of "maintenance thinking" it becomes rigid, hyper predictable and brittle. This alone creates the conditions for competitors to exploit its unseen weaknesses. Instead of taking risk and breaking the cycle of dysfunction to course correct, far too often these organizations fall into the organizational OCD death spiral constructing more bureaucracy. This of course only causes more problems feeding the exponential quotient. When they should be taking more innovative risk they actually do the opposite which locks out the very mavericks they need to right the ship. 

When a nation, an organization or a people don't take risk, they by default cede their opportunities to those who will rise up and take the necessary risk in the time of disruption when fear grips and tears at those who merely tried to maintain their positioning. Innovation and creative solutions are fearful things to those who have become slaves to their maintenance of present position. Such static thinking creates its destruction by denial mechanisms meant to "maintain" over "move forward." Nothing in this world is truly static. Everything is dynamic and ever changing. When business or government or individuals settle for "maintain" they are actually choosing  the dynamic of loss instead of gain. As the organization is disrupted it either adapts to changing conditions or it perishes. 

But alas this is when those visionaries... Those mavericks rise to the occasion and seize the day. Every great victory is preceded by years of agonizing failures and setbacks. But are they really failures and setbacks? No they are part of the crucible which makes the maverick into who they really are. So too this can be with organizations. 

Are you a maverick or a maintainer? Does you organization and it's leadership exhibit maverick or maintainer tendencies? 

Does your professional DNA admire or loath mavericks? Your survival in the new economy may depend on how you and your organization answer that question. Are you willing to accept the mavericks? Because they won't stop being mavericks even if you don't trying stop being in their way. They will succeed. They will rise and one day you will need those unknown mavericks to step up whether you like it or not. They are here and they are coming in greater numbers. You can bet they will bring real change to you and your organizations. Or they will replace them. Better a friend than a foe. 

A few thoughts to ponder from an American Maverick. Think it forward now. 

 

-Max Daves

CEO (idea)ology Group

Co-founder Safe Haven Strategic

(futurist | serial innovator | global strategist | visionary | socially conscious entrepreneur | radical solutionist | status quo disruptor | chief idea-ologist)

"Break the rules they taught you in business school. If it really worked they wouldn't have been teaching them to you... They would have been proving it works by doing it. Now let's go think up something new and make it happen." 

If you are interested in learning how to take yourself, your ideas or your organization "maverick" email max@idea-ology.com or visit www.idea-ology.com 

Reinvent Your Business Model or Die

Reinvent Your Business Model or Die

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vala-afshar/reinvent-your-business-mo_b_5857056.html

Reinvent Your Business Model or Die | Vala Afshar               

                Reinvent Your Business Model or Die                                                                                      

                                              ‘Change almost never fails because it’s too early. It almost always fails because it’s too late.’ - Seth Godin One of the key components of transformation and innovation is the business model, and since the ability of companies to transform and reinvent themselves is crucial to their lifeline, I went straight to the source, the global expert on business models and author of the international bestseller, Business Model Generation, Dr. Alexander Osterwalder.

Dr. Alexander Osterwalder (Twitter: @AlexOsterwalder)Large companies today don’t always understand their current business model very well, let alone be thinking of what the next one will be, yet according to Osterwalder it is the ability to both execute on the current business model while thinking of the business model of tomorrow that will ultimately be the difference between a company that is a one hit wonder and one that is here to stay. To address the fact that very few companies are able to do both at the same time without a tool to help them, Osterwalder invented the “Business Model Canvas,” a strategic management tool to design, test, build and manage business models.How to develop a business model for today and tomorrow:1. All master craftsman have the right tools - On Twitter (@alexosterwalder), Dr. Osterwalder says that he won’t rest until senior executives and entrepreneurs operate as surgeons. He tells us to think of having to go through heart surgery and here comes your surgeon with one tool in his hands - and it’s a Swiss army knife.  Scary thought.  Just as a surgeon needs a variety of tools to perform specific operations, company executives need business tools that are practical and go beyond SWOT analysis. This idea was the inspiration for his book and company, Strategyzer. At the heart of the book, Business Model Generation, is a tool called the Business Model Canvas, which allows companies to visualize their business model using 9 building blocks to develop a one-page blueprint of their strategy and tell the story of how they are creating, storing and delivering value.There’s a reason why in the competitive business book market (where 250,000 books exist already and another 11,000 come out each year) why one million copies of Business Model Generation have already been sold. Osterwalder attributes the success of the book to fact that it differentiates itself from the others by being very visual and helping to simplify a complex thing like business models. “The Business Model Canvas enables companies to get out of the world of blah, blah, blah and into the world where strategic conversations are mapped to something more tangible and concrete,” says Osterwalder.2. Design, search, iterate and rinse and repeat - The Business Model Canvas is very simple, yet the implications of the Canvas are deep.  In fact, it’s the foundation of a Stanford University course taught by Steve Blank, seasoned entrepreneur and Harvard recognized “Master of Innovation”.  “In the next meeting where you have to talk about the business model or strategy, get everyone around a canvas to sketch it out,” recommends Osterwalder. “You may think that everyone is on same page, but that is not always the case.”  The goal is to be able to sketch out a Business Model Canvas and throw it away in the next minute. Sketch it and test it immediately by getting out of the building and talking to customers to determine if the pains you think your customer has are really there. If they are not, it’s back to the drawing board - an iterative process that Osterwalder calls design and search, where you prototype a Business Model Canvas and throw it away until you have actual evidence that it is going to work.  The Business Model Canvas is the tool that is shaping the idea, and the search is giving the evidence that it is going to work. An iteration process is an important element of business model design. With an initial idea there is a larger degree of uncertainty, which is why Osterwalder recommends doing cheap tests, such as talking to customers or giving customers a link to go to for more information and then tracking if they actually clicked through, that allow companies to learn.  As uncertainty is gradually reduced, companies can increase spending on experiments until they have enough evidence.  The more they know, the more they can invest.  The next step is to turn the evidence from the market into execution; this is where companies can switch from the search mode into execution mode where they can scale the idea. 3. Business plans are a waste of time; execute today while inventing for tomorrow - If you are a large company, the Business Model Canvas can help you to better execute on your existing business while at the same time allowing you to create a playground to think about the business models of tomorrow - essential for reinventing your company in the face of constant disruption.  Osterwalder says that a lot of successful companies today are applying their logic from their existing business plan onto the business models of tomorrow, but because you don’t know what’s going to work, the answer cannot be found within their four walls. So are business plans a waste of time? Osterwalder and Chuck Blakeman, founder and owner of The Crankest Group think so. Steve Blank’s view on business plans is that they do not serve a useful purpose, and he, like Osterwalder, proposes a business model instead.“Tools like the Business Model Canvas help to leverage a process that companies are already doing but in a better way,” explains Osterwalder who says it is more important today to have such a tool because companies need to change their business models more frequently and having a tool can take the pain out of the process. People are struggling with the fact that their old business models are expiring.  If you compare Kodak and Fugi, two companies whose core business was disrupted by digital, Kodak went bankrupt because they were incapable of reinventing themselves, while Fugi succeeded because they were able to successfully reinvent themselves.4. Hire a Chief Corporate Entrepreneur  - CEOs apply the principles of execution to the search of new business models, which according to Osterwalder, does not work because they don’t test the business models and the business plan. Today in large companies, Osterwalder is calling for a second job title that operates at the same level and in close partnership with the CEO (Chief Execution Officer). The new title that Osterwalder is proposing, the Chief Corporate Entrepreneur, would be tasked with inventing the future of the company, whereas the CEO is tasked with running the existing business that is financing the future.  The idea behind the new role is that companies run by entrepreneurs are able to reinvent themselves. Osterwalder points to Apple, a company that demonstrates proactive reinvention by introducing new products that make existing ones obsolete (iPhone disrupts the iPod, etc.).  In addition, he says that the number of business models that Amazon is running today is spectacular and they are able to build on the business models that are already running while diversifying. 5. Articulate your customer value proposition - The Business Model Canvas allows companies to describe how they are creating value for their company.  In his new book, Value Proposition Design, Osterwalder provides a new tool for companies to describe how they are creating value for their customer.  The tool allows companies to visualize in a concrete way how products and services are creating value for their customers, something which many companies are currently unable to articulate. The tool zooms into two boxes on the Business Model Canvas, the value proposition and the customer segment being targeted, and provides a visual map to describe how products and services are creating value for customers. It allows companies to connect products and services to the pain relievers and gain creators of customers, and provides them with a shared language to make strategic things more tangible and to be explicit about how they are creating value for customers. Value Proposition Design will be available for purchase on October 20th, but you can get a sneak peek of 100 pages for free on Osterwalder’s website.6. Make the business model everyone’s responsibility - Everyone in the company is responsible for the business model and the value proposition says Osterwalder, who paints a future where these kinds of tools will replace the current broken strategic planning process and offer a social system and living tool that everyone will understand, have visibility into and use to contribute to the corporate strategy.“If the large company wants to survive they will need to drastically change. Continuous reinvention will be the new normal.  Companies who think it’s enough to have one great business model are disposable; they will get big and then disappear. The ones that continuously reinvent themselves will be around for the long haul.” 

                         

Follow Vala Afshar on Twitter:

            www.twitter.com/ValaAfshar                                            

    What Is Working: Small Businesses

image.jpg

The Cloudizen Civilization is upon us.

The Cloudizen Civilization is upon us.

I read a study a while ago that was conducted with a group of 12-14 year old young girls, and their daily communication habits. The individuals in this study group averaged 6-8 hours of "on line" time per day - between Facebook, twitter, texting, on and on.

The study itself was very interesting, but one of the little girls quotes particularly struck me - she said: *"when I don't have my phone, I am no longer sure who I am". *

Their personalities are now an extension of the network, or the cloud.

It seems to me that we have already moved beyond the "digital natives" and now have a generation of what I'll term "cloud citizens", or "cloudizens". Their consciousness is partially in the cloud.

Cloudizens see themselves as a group consciousness - and no longer necessarily as individuals. They vet everything to their group. And in the case of this study group, there is seldom any adult supervision. I have no idea what this portends, but it seems to me that Cloudizen thinking is closer to the hunter / gatherer period (tight knit groups) than the agricultural and industrial age of individuality. Before you condemn the Cloudizens, turn your smartphone off for a day. You are closer to them than you think.

*"Humans say: First we use machines, then we wear machines, then we become machines. Machines say: First we serve humans, then we augment humans, and then we are humans." - * Kim William Gordon

As we become Ghosts in the Machine

As we become Ghosts in the Machine

We have undergone numerous stages of interaction between humans and computers - we are getting closer to actually "being inside the machine" as opposed to being on the outside looking in.

The ways in which individuals interact with computers has changed dramatically.

· Keyboard Interface – the initial means of interaction with machines was exclusively through keyboard commands (or via such keyboard secondary means as punched tape, cards, magnetic tapes). Computers at this time were expensive, and required extensive training and complex programming knowledge in order to interact with them. They were slow.

· Mouse Interface – at the beginning of the “personal computer” era, keyboard input was augmented with the now common “mouse”. This allowed individuals to interact with the machine in a more free form manner, and allowed the development of computer based analogs to the real world, such as “folders” and “files”. This input interface allowed the development of such disruptive technologies as Photoshop, 3D Computer Aided Design / Computer Aided Manufacturing as well as the commonly known word processors, spread sheets and other digital replacements for traditional business, engineering and creative systems.

· Touch Input Interface – now very familiar to most, touch screens allow direct manipulation of the information within the computer via “touch, click, squeeze and drag” maneuvering. Generally, there is no mouse component to this interface, however the ability to use a digital keyboard is common. Recent innovations in this input method include “raised” interface and “touch screen modification”, where the touch screen changes physical characteristics (such as, becoming “rougher” or “dimpled” based upon the application’s requirements.

· Post Touch Input Interface – this is the new horizon for machine interaction. Composed of both voice and gesture recognition, this emerging means of machine interaction allows the machine to recognize basic human communication efforts and respond to them. Voice recognition systems are part of this environs.

· Wearable computation devices – although technically not a human interface method, the development of machines which monitor individual human performance telemetry (i.e. tools to measure a persons pace, their GPS coordinates, their heart rate, blood pressure, etc.) as well as their immediate environmental conditions, are already commonplace as add on apps within many smart phone systems. Utilization of Radio Frequency Identification Tags, Face recognition systems and crowd shared data (best friends, common interests, favorite restaurant, etc.) all add bulk to this “cloud” of data accumulated per person. Think of Charlie Browns cartoon character Pig Pen - the cloud that follows a modern human around is not of dust and dirt, but of personal data. A cloud following the individual around 24 hours a day, accessible instantaneously. All of this data is "input".

· The Internet of Everything – in 2008 the number of “things” (devices, lights, heating systems, traffic systems, the list is inexhaustible) outnumbered the number of humans connected to the Internet. This vast and growing amount of data can be and is captured and included in the human – computer interface.

· Computer Augmented Human Systems – the sheer volume of human augmentation systems coming to the market is incredible. Brain implants designed to assist Alzheimer patients memory retention and implants designed to reduce or eliminate elliptic seizures, are here and being integrated into the human cranium. Computer assisted replacement limbs, optical sight enhancements and computer directed blood borne nano technology is no longer in the realm of science fiction, but science fact. To quote Arthur C. Clarke “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

· Augmented Reality Interaction – combined with the Post Touch Input Interface means of interaction, wearable computation and the Internet of Everything (above), this interaction places the individual within the computing environment itself, Google Glass project and the Apple equivalent are charting this new territory.

As we dive deeper into the bowls of the machine, the concept of “reality” will begin to blur. We will be looking at the universe from within the interior of the computer – and will being to have difficulty determining where “reality” ends and “augmented reality” begins. *At this point, we will truly have become the Ghosts in the Machine.*

The five possible futures of humanity.

The five possible futures of humanity.

I conduct an undergrad and graduate class presentation about the acceleration of technological innovation and its impact on changing social and cultural “norms”. I always talk about my 5 possible scenarios for human kind within the next 30 – 50 years (there are probably more). - Extinction Scenario – a distinct possibility, if we don’t get our environmental act and societal conflicts under control. If we don’t, then we might deserve this scenario - but what a waste. - Luddite Scenario – We dismantle technology and return to simpler (my bias: harsher) times. Very unlikely. (Look up Luddites) - Terminator Scenario – Named after the movie, we are extinguished by the machines we create. I don’t believe in this scenario due to my view of the below mentioned Singularity. - Status Quo Scenario – nothing changes from here on out. Yea, right. See previous 150,000 years of human history for reference. Technology has always changed us. Always will. Man the magic maker. - Singularity Scenario – We blend into the machine, and humans become the ghosts in the machine. In such a scenario, a Terminator future is unlikely, as we would be committing suicide. I always start the rest of the conversation with the students with this observation: “The greatest challenge to humanity in the next 50 years is defining exactly what being human is.... especially as we continue to augment the human experience with extensions, reality augmentation and genetic engineering.”Here's a simpler question: When grandpa is 80% machine, is he still grandpa?We may never be able to answer this question. I don’t think we ever could. I don’t think we ever should. "Humans say: First we use machines, then we wear machines, then we become machines. Machines say: First we serve humans, then we augment humans, and then we are humans." - Kim William Gordon

The Origin of Mathematics, or “How music gave us the stars”

The Origin of Mathematics, or “How music gave us the stars”

I have developed a theory on the origins of mathematics. Or at least, I think I developed it, my Google searches have not resulted in any similar thoughts, so I’d appreciate any commentary on this topic that folks have or discover.

I started by thinking about music.

One of the radio stations I listen to (KDHX.org – an incredibly interesting and eclectic public radio station) was interviewing a musician. I apologize that I do not recall his name. During the interview the musician mentioned that music is really composed of a lot of physics and math. From vibration and frequency, to the physical impact of air density and eventually including the math of music notation - which is full of ½ notes, ¼ notes, rests (you get my point). It takes a lot of math to make music, even if you are not aware of it.

What I then started wondering about was the origin of the human experience with music. Music seems to have been with us since the dawn of our consciousness. The earliest known flutes date from 35,000 to 43,000 years ago. And these are the flutes that survived. The human voice has been with us all along (approximately 150,000 years) and we probably have been singing the majority of that time. Many suspect that instrumental music in some form (drums, hollow logs, vibrating gut strings, bone flutes) has been around since the very beginning, but evidence of these instruments has simply vanished, back into the earth.

Therefore, we seem to have been making music since our inception. Perhaps even before Homo Sapiens (us) with the human lines that came before us and even with our cousins, the Neanderthal. Music is part of what makes “us”, it really is part of our DNA.

Humanity, then, it seems, is not the toy maker, but the music maker.

So here’s my theory – since Music is based upon mathematics, it was Music itself that configured the human mind to conceive of mathematics to begin with. It re-engineered our brains (as all technology does) to understand the fundamental characteristics of the universe (what better way than with harmony, eh?). Music led us to perceive the mathematics that constitute the fabric of space and time itself. We did not “invent” math, we “discovered” it, and Music was the ship that got us there.

And once we discovered the universe of math, we re-engineered the world. Math is in everything we do - - it’s in our houses, our cars, our communications, our medicine, our energy our space station, our economy, our moon and Mars exploration and just about anything else you can think of that you use on a daily basis. Math allows us to peer into the heavens and understand the stars. And one day, math will take us to the stars as well.

I wonder what kind of music we will be playing along the way? "Across the Universe" by the Beatles?

Humans say: First we use machines, then we wear machines, then we become machines. Machines say: First we serve humans, then we augment humans, and then we are humans." - Kim William Gordon

Human 2.0

Human 2.0

Human 2.0

Humanity is an interesting creature. We are incredibly talented, creative and imaginative. In this century, indeed perhaps this decade, we are poised on the edge of either catastrophic extinction, or the beginning of an incredible journey that re-engineers who we are, and launches us to the stars.

"Humans say: First we use machines, then we wear machines, then we become machines. Machines say: First we serve humans, then we augment humans, and then we are humans." As we march towards convergence.

  • Kim William Gordon

We lit up the world.

We lit up the world.

Context check. http://www.americaslibrary.gov/jb/gilded/jbgildededison_1.html

Electricity was "high tech" less than 135 years ago. We wired the world, and then we lit it up. We built incredible communications technologies. We changed human relationships to each other and to our inventions. We changed the human relationship to our own universe or what may be a multiverse.

So - there is no such thing as "this is how we have always done things" Because this is all new territory for the human experience. There is no box. There has never been one.

"Humans: *For first we use machines, then we wear machines, then we become machines.* Machines: *First we serve humans, then we augment humans, then we are humans.*" We march together towards Human 2.0

Kim William Gordon